{"id":14,"date":"2026-07-11T21:30:18","date_gmt":"2026-07-11T21:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bitjackpot.de.com\/review-methodology\/"},"modified":"2026-07-11T21:34:44","modified_gmt":"2026-07-11T21:34:44","slug":"review-methodology","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/bitjackpot.de.com\/ru\/review-methodology\/","title":{"rendered":"Review Methodology \u2014 The Jackpot Score"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Jackpot Score<\/strong> is Bit Jackpot’s independent editorial rating for a crypto casino, expressed on a 0 to 10 scale to one decimal place. It is not an average of user reviews, a popularity contest, or a paid placement. It is the considered judgement of our editorial team, built from six published sub-scores that each measure a specific, checkable part of an operator’s offering. Because the method is fixed and public, you can see exactly why one casino earns an 8.4 and another a 6.1, and hold us to it across our crypto casino reviews<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This page sets out how the score is built, the evidence we require before publishing a number, and how often we re-check it. For a shorter, plain-language walkthrough written for new readers, start with reading the Jackpot Score<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The six sub-scores and their weights<\/h2>\n

Every review is marked against the same six categories, using the same fixed weights. The weights total 100% and never change from one operator to the next. Licensing and Safety carries the most weight on purpose: in a market full of anonymous offshore brands, whether an operator is genuinely licensed and how it handles your money matters more than any welcome bonus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Sub-score<\/th>\nWeight<\/th>\nWhat it measures<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Licensing & Safety<\/td>\n25%<\/td>\nA licence we can verify at the regulator’s own register, plus account security, fairness signals, and how complaints and locked funds are handled.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Payout Speed<\/td>\n20%<\/td>\nHow fast verified withdrawals clear, from a real cash-out where possible or aggregated player-report data, and whether extra checks stall them.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Crypto Support<\/td>\n20%<\/td>\nThe coins and networks supported, on-chain fee handling, deposit and withdrawal minimums, and how clear limits are before you commit funds.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Game Selection<\/td>\n15%<\/td>\nThe depth and quality of slots, live tables, and provably fair titles, the studios behind them, and how openly return-to-player is stated.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bonus Value<\/td>\n10%<\/td>\nThe real, after-terms worth of a bonus once wagering, game weighting, maximum bets, and expiry are counted, not the headline percentage.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Customer Support<\/td>\n10%<\/td>\nWhether help is reachable, responsive, and genuinely useful, which channels and hours are offered, and how it responds when things go wrong.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

How the weighted average is calculated<\/h2>\n

Each sub-score is marked from 0 to 10. We multiply each sub-score by its weight, add the six results together, and round to one decimal place. Nothing else feeds into the headline number, and there is no discretionary “editor’s bump.”<\/p>\n

Here is a worked example for an illustrative casino. These figures are a demonstration of the arithmetic only; they are not a rating of any real operator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Sub-score<\/th>\nWeight<\/th>\nExample mark<\/th>\nWeighted contribution<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Licensing & Safety<\/td>\n25%<\/td>\n8.0<\/td>\n2.000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Payout Speed<\/td>\n20%<\/td>\n7.5<\/td>\n1.500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Crypto Support<\/td>\n20%<\/td>\n9.0<\/td>\n1.800<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Game Selection<\/td>\n15%<\/td>\n8.5<\/td>\n1.275<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bonus Value<\/td>\n10%<\/td>\n6.0<\/td>\n0.600<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Customer Support<\/td>\n10%<\/td>\n7.0<\/td>\n0.700<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Adding the contributions gives 2.000 + 1.500 + 1.800 + 1.275 + 0.600 + 0.700 = 7.875, which we publish as a Jackpot Score of 7.9<\/strong>. The weighting is what makes licensing decisive: it counts for more than twice what a bonus does, so a licensing failure moves the score far more than a weak promotion ever could.<\/p>\n

The evidence checklist we complete before a score is published<\/h2>\n

No Jackpot Score goes live until a reviewer has completed and logged the checklist below. If any item cannot be satisfied, we do not publish a score at all.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Licence verified at the source.<\/strong> The operator’s licence is confirmed directly against the issuing regulator’s own public register, not against a logo or a claim on the casino’s own website. Our full approach is set out in our licensing verification policy<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  2. At least one real payout data point.<\/strong> Payout Speed is backed by a genuine deposit and withdrawal we carried out, or, where a first-hand test is not possible, by credibly aggregated player-report data. We never guess a withdrawal time.<\/li>\n
  3. Current bonus terms confirmed.<\/strong> Every wagering requirement, maximum cash-out, and expiry window we quote is checked against the operator’s own live terms and conditions page on the day of review.<\/li>\n
  4. Named editorial sign-off.<\/strong> A named editor reviews the evidence and signs off before the score goes live. The reviewer and the signing editor are recorded in our internal production log; in public, reviews carry the collective Bit Jackpot Editorial Team byline.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    How often we re-check a score<\/h2>\n

    A score is a snapshot, and crypto casinos change quickly, so we re-verify on a schedule rather than leaving old numbers to drift:<\/p>\n